(274) Sam Harris´ true thoughts on life, the universe and everything

Around 11:20 on the evening of February 22nd 2013 I was viewing an e mail link that my wife had just sent me. She had been disputing an earlier statistic that I had advanced where Sam Harris had cited 38% of British Muslims supporting the death penalty for any apostate. It may be heard here at 3:00 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZVYfADAnw8&list=PL45FAA00C0F2F490E

I had sent her one link to Harris on Youtube where he gave a high % and was now moved to e mail her across (she was actually in an adjacent room!) another one where he gave a still higher figure. She was not enthusiastic about Harris and sent me across this link - http://www.loonwatch.com/tag/sam-harris/ I began reading it, and did not find it very supportive of her negativity. 
Whilst I did so I happened to have a Youtube link continuing to play in the background. When I reached this point in the loonwatch piece -

There is no vice in having once been religious, for we all of us inherit our mythologies from our parents, but Harris did not inherit his Buddhist and Hindu beliefs. He was bred in a secular home, granted a secular education and lived in a secular state. Instead, he chose to abandon his secular upbringing and voluntarily convert to a foreign religious system.
He claims to have shed his former dogmatism, but telling by the loving chapter on mysticism in The End of Faith, it is clear that he sets much stock by some articles of those creeds. It also clarifies why he studiously will not say, as any materialist should have no problem affirming, that there is no afterlife. In numerous occasions when the subject has arisen either in his book or when he's been asked if he believes that consciousness lives on beyond the death of the brain in interviews like this Salon appearance, he has chosen to either declare his belief in reincarnation or, if the audience is a sceptical lot, preferred the evasive formulation of "I just don't know" because "If we were living in a universe where consciousness survived death, or transcended the brain so that single neurons were conscious – or subatomic particles had an interior (subjective) dimension – we would not expect to see it by our present techniques of neuro-imaging or cellular neuroscience."
When he's reminded by Salon that, in spite of his claim to be driven by data, that on the contrary "Most evolutionary biologists would say consciousness is rooted in the brain. It will not survive death." He responds "I just don't know".
There was a crystallising display of his Buddhist convictions some years ago at the Salk Institute. He was asked point blank by the physicist Lawrence Krauss if he thinks reincarnation is true and Harris shrugged "Who knows?" Alluding to the case studies of past-life regressions by Ian Stevenson cited in The End of Faith, he explained "There are these spooky stories." When the assembled congregation of scientists erupted in astonished laughter at his religious credulity, he grew visibly nervous and, keen to skate past the embarrassing moment, shot back with "Okay, you are on firm ground being sceptical about reincarnation ... I have published a few spooky things about telepathy and reincarnation which amount to not an endorsement of these beliefs, but just, you know, I hear there is all this data and someone like Dean Radin writes a book about it, and Brian Josephson, a Nobel Laureate in physics, blurbs it. I don't have the time to do the meta-analyses and statistical expertise. So, I'm awaiting the evidence. Listen (with rising chagrin) I don't want to talk about reincarnation. It may be."
where this link occurs - Sam Harris: Fearless Among Peers - YouTube - and as I read Krauss ́ questioning and Harris ́ response on the subject of reincarnation I simultaneously got to hear it (35 minutes in) because the Youtube link - which was not actually quite the same one as that supplied in the loonwatch link - reached precisely the same point. 
Even though I see little in the above piece to affirm Fiona's statements re Harris' supposed Islamophobia, to me it lends even more weight to the supposition that he was, quite possibly, not being 100% truthful about his beliefs concerning life, the universe and everything.

Harris is CEO of Project Reason (which I also followed on Twitter) and he and I had exchanged a few tweets a few days earlier, e.g.
  1. Well, what were you trying to contact during your long meditative exercises with spiritual teachers?
    9:45 p.m. - Feb 18, 2013 · Details
  2. Feb 18
    The soul's absence...
You're a remarkable man, Sam: valuing spiritual experience whilst espousing atheism + non-dualism. Highly unusual in that.


He replied that he was now writing a book on that.
To which I Tweeted in response -

Doesn't sound like your leveling with us, Sam. Doubt whether your pal Dawkins would have done that just to prove a negative..

When later that very evening I signed up to receive updates from his website I noticed that the two tweets of his to me were still visible at the right hand side of his site ́s home page -

Profile

Sam Harris

 

SamHarrisOrg @JamesPlaskett I am now writing a book on the subject... 3 days ago · reply · retweet · Favorite
SamHarrisOrg Jonah Lehrer breaks his silence: bit.ly/XYW81y4 days ago · reply · retweet · Favorite
SamHarrisOrg @JamesPlaskett The soul's absence...


On April 6th 2017 there occured a codicil.
I clicked on what struck me as an inexplicable ́piece ́of rather alien text. It is caused by ́HTTP text ́ and appears right at the start of this Entry.
This resulted in my accessing a now disused Twitter account of mine and I saw that atop the list of ́tweets ́ was my retweeting a quote of Rumi ́s -

 Retweeted
  19 Nov 2014
""What you seek is seeking you."" ~ Rumi "
That caused me to check out more re Rumi.
And I quickly ́followed ́both an account giving quotes of his and also the account of The Reverend Michael Jones.
I also looked up Rumi ́s Wikipedia Entry -

Rumi.


September 1207 – 17 December 1273), was a 13th century Persian[1][7] Sunni[8] Muslim poet, jurist, Islamic scholar, theologian , and Sufi mystic.[9] Rumi's influence transcends national borders and ethnic divisions: Iranians, Tajiks, Turks, Greeks, Pashtuns, other Central Asian Muslims , and the Muslims of South Asia have greatly appreciated his spiritual legacy for the past seven centuries. His poems have been widely translated into many of the world's languages... Rumi has been described as the "most popular poet"[11] and the "best selling poet" in the United States.









Just a few moments later I heard Sam Harris refer to Rumi on a clip I had playing on Youtube. That arose through his discussing with Neil deGrasse Tyson: "Are You an Atheist?" as he spoke of his appreciation of Arabic culture. It crops up at 12:00 here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WO7tHZVW3Cg
(My wife, herself a published poet of some reknown, had also never heard of Rumi.)

And the Rumi quote which the misattribution of text here led me to is a rendering of the Sufi aphorism, 
"When a man looks for truth, truth looks for him."
That Sufism I had heard circa 1980 from Michael Basman.

Already I had long appended THAT as the last of the quotes featuring here in my Explanation Entry - http://james-plasketts-coincidence diary.blogspot.com.es/2006/03/explanation.html

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Narrative, plus Epilogues and Appendices

Image
" When a man looks for Truth, Truth looks for him." (Sufi aphorism) "The plural of anecdote is not data." Introduction The coincidences in this section, mostly from early 1988, seemed to lend themselves more easily to a narrative exposition.  To those examples which are, to some extent, verifiable,  I have appended a V. And to make the following of it all easier I shall begin with a synopsis. Before I begin, permit me to note that when, in April 1994, I attended the Society for Psychical Research Psi/Synchronicity workshop  (94) Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge (james-plasketts-coincidence-diary.blogspot.com)   I was made aware by Dr Caroline Watt of what she called the "Mine Vs Yours" syndrome. i.e. that people tend habitually to regard their own coincidences as more cute, amusing, worthy of attention than those of others.  I think this is basically for two reasons:- a) Having lived through it all the experiencer will of...
Read more

(166) Paula Yates and family and friends. And from the Third to the Fourth

Image
( AMPLIFY ING the above article will make it easier to read.) I first met Fiona in March 1994, marrying her in December 1995 and hence moving to Hastings. I noted that a lot of her arty friends and neighbours had children with unusual names. Judy Neate had a son called Bingo, and Alistair Fairley a son called Paris and a daughter called Carson. Laetitia Yhap had a son called Ajax and Craig Sams a grandson called Mars. Unconventional children’s names automatically prompted thoughts of the TV personality, Paula Yates, and her four daughters - Fifi Trixibelle, Peaches Honeyblossom, Little Pixie and Heavenly Hiraani Tiger Lily. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paula_Yates More than once, in the first years of our relationship, I joked to Fiona that all we needed now was for Paula Yates to move into the area. Ms Yates had a close friend in Jo Fairley, Alistair’s sister, who had a house just around the corner from us. We had heard that Paula would sometimes be seen in the shops of Hastings...
Read more

(281) "Are you not entertained?"

Image
At 21:12 on June 29th 2015 I was flicking through a Youtube version of the 2000 film Gladiator - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbBiXPVKuTA I reached the point just before a particular scene which I wanted to see. Other available versions showed only certain excised scenes, but not the film in its entirety. It is where the gladiator portrayed by Russell Crowe talks with the slave owner played by the late Oliver Reed. The preceding scene, where Crowe takes on and slaughters a half dozen gladiators one by one, I had seen before as one of those excised. I now saw Crowe, after his killing spree, lobbing his sword to hit a distant table and asking of the ampitheatre crowd, "Are you not entertained? Are you not entertained? Is this not why you are here?" He then spits into the dust and walks off as the crowd chant his name. And I had seen that finale before, too. But the complete film here seemed to show a slightly different cut to that with which I was familiar. A missing bit ...
Read more